Functor hierarchy proposal
Currently the standard libraries include a Functor class and a Monad class, and Functor is not a superclass of Monad, even though logically every monad is a functor. New classes have been added to HEAD to create a richer hierarchy of Functor classes:
class Functor f where fmap :: (a -> b) -> f a -> f b class Functor f => Applicative f where pure :: a -> f a (<*>) :: f (a -> b) -> f a -> f b (*>) :: Applicative f => f a -> f b -> f b fa *> fb = (fmap (const id) fa) <*> fb
I propose that "pure" be renamed "return", "*>" be renamed ">>", and that Monad be made a subclass of Applicative:
class (Applicative f) => Monad f where (>>=) :: f a -> (a -> f b) -> f b
The downside of this is that every instance declaration of Monad would have to be accompanied by instance declarations for the superclasses, but see Class system extension proposal.
